Leader Characteristics and Foreign Policy Performance Essay

The old saying heroes atomic number 18 made, not born attains the making of leaders and lead. The exceptional courage, nobility and strength attri thates to the important spirit of a hero that may be brought about by a particular circumstance. Within the circumstance of a lead referring to a chair, the epitome of a hero is may be characterized by a political will or the strong finding in role- laying by effecting the sovereign ordinance of the people pondering of harnessing socio-political fear at home and abroad.The role- fashion casting of a president represents impact towards interstate ( domestic) and outside(prenominal) (intrastate) policies. Thus, the epitome of a hero is outlined in the execution of policies in which heroes are made. This paper will discuss the critical role-model of leadership that is bestowed upon the mandate of a President symbolical to the creation and performance of alien policies. US outside indemnity decision illustrating the rationa l actor modelIn the most recent electronic journal issue published by the Council on Foreign Relations (2008) features the article, The Future of the Statesn Power How America Can Survive the Rise of the Rest, adapted from the book of Fareed Zakaria (2008), discusses Britains and Americas distinctions of impertinent political major power illustrates the political leadership of the empire. According to the article, there has been tremendous remove of political power shifted from various political leadership wherein Britain and America competed.The geological fault is perceived to be on the third wave in which the rest of political power shifting remains a window of opportunity for the US to shape and outmatch the changing human beings(a) landscape, in which the strength and dynamism to continue make the world can overcome its political dysfunction and reorient its foreign polity for a world defined by the rise of different powers (Zakaria, 2008). From the point of view of Za karia, the rest of rising powers in the third shift is the current focus of a foreign policy within the social, political and economical rationale of the US politics, and specifically a primary order of business under scrubbing leadership.The rational actor model that could be attributed to Bush leadership may be exemplified by the comprehensive enactment of the light Reform and Terrorism Pr notwithstandingtion Act (IRTPA) of 2004, in which the interior(a) and global call of President Bush for safe (America) and secured world is by enacting strategical reforms in the science community and the streamlining of the US bureaucracy.To cite the coherence of the commerce for safe and secured world is outlined under Section 7001 of the IRTPA that states the provisions, such as (Paragraph 2) to win the war on terrorism, the United States must assign to economic and diplomatic capabilities the same strategic priority that is assigned to soldiery capabilities, and (Paragraph 3) the legislative and executive branches of the Government of the United States must commit to robust, long-term investments in all of the tools necessary for the foreign policy of the United States to successfully attain the goals of the United States (IRTPA, 2004 in US Public Law 108458, 2004). It is therefore reflective of Zakarias (2008) work that the third shift of power by appear brasss and world economies is the focal point of the US shifting of political leadership through its decision illustrating the leaders rational actor model in bod a foreign policy. US foreign policy decision illustrating the hero-in-history modelThe messianic complex has been attributed to the character of leadership of President Bush in the US war on Iraq. It may cede been recalled that US 9/11 tragedy imbibe sprouted with the hero-villain role-modeling that refers to the US servicemen as hero that fought the villainous terrorists cohorts in Saddam Husseins tyrannical regime in Iraq. In which case, the US war on Iraq was attributed to the messianic redemption that freed the Iraqi people from the bondage of tyranny and regenerate the democratic physical processes. Several political experts says that the character of Bush leadership has in some degrees being a romanticist the sentimentalism that catalyzes finality and unwavering acts.Thus, the hero-in-history model is patterned and entangled to the history of war and gaining dominance. In effect, the hero-in-history model has immanent circumstance and dominion vis-a-vis tailored in a foreign policy. As cited from the article of Lynne Olson in the electronic magazine of The Guardian, George Bushs favorite role model is famously Jesus Christ but Winston Churchill is close behind (Olson, L. , 2007). According to Olson the idolatry is circumstantial in the roseate to power of government leaders, in which the hero-in-history has inherent value referring to Bush curiosity to the works of Churchill in uniting and bringing the all y nations against Hitler as comparatively what the US did on its war to Iraq.It may be perceived that the framing of the socio-economic-political aspects of US foreign policy manifests larger-than-life adventurism that exalts the hero-in-history model of American policy, and specifically the so-called heroic idealism of the President. US foreign policy decision employing the psychobiographical model Based on the book Profiling Political leaders Cross-Cultural Studies of Personality and Behavior by Ofer Feldman and Linda O. Valenty, the psychobiographical model deeply cogitate the individual(prenominal)ity (inner-self) of the leader towards the leadership style. Meaning, personal ideals or beliefs is being utilise in the capacity to govern the state or lead the government in enacting policies.To cite, the system of psychobiography assume that leaders personal histories and childhood experiences are essential aspect that characterized the personality and leaders convictions that i nfluences the mode, predisposition and performance in decision making (Kaarbo, J. , 2001 in Feldman & Valenty, 2001). One example that could best describe the personal (psychobiographical model) influence in the process of decision making is the personal conviction of President Bush in his ideals for safe and secured world as being referred by American war historians as a recycled impression as inspired by his father, the former President George H. W.Bush, during the US armament deployment in the Middle East in the 1990s known as Operation Desert Storm (The sporty House, 2008). It may be in any case recalled that former President Richard Nixons (1913-1994) abhorrence to socialism and communism have led to US aggression in Vietnam that weakened the diplomatic ties with China, Soviet Union and the Middle East, and left the American economy into recession (The White House, 2008). It could be viewed that the psychobiographical model relating to the influence factor of the leader in the process of decision making somehow affects the direction, significance and performance of a policy in light of the sovereign will.In which case, the effect could be in the derailment (consistency or inconsistency) or achievement of a policy that addresses all the socio-economic-political interstate (domestic) and intrastate (foreign) perspectives. At hindsight, the enactment of the IRTPA of 2004 could bear the idealistic norm of ensuring a safe and secured world, in which the US foreign policy adheres to those ideals. significance of political terminologies According to Barbara Kellerman (1983) of Farleigh Dickinson University, the Bureaucratic Politics Model or bpm is the identification and systematic installation of key government functions in which the governments hierarchical organization compose a bureaucracy.The BPM has been enforced in the US war on Iraq, as exemplified by the streamlining or functional alignment of political agencies through multi-lateral functions wi th the legislative, judiciary, executive branches of the government and its military establishments. In short, BPM is a synergy within a governmental function pre-disposal to the process of decision making and enactment of a domestic and foreign policy (Kellerman, 1983). Decision avoidance is being defined by sociologist as a common type of indecision particularly in major decision making referring to the acts of the President, policy makers, military leaders and even the private corporate chief executives. The decision avoidance is also characterized by playing safe attitude to decide on a situation, circumstance or state of facts wherein critical analysis is needed (Michael, A. , 2006).Instrumental tenability is being described as a requirement of coherence on non-instrumental desires and means-end beliefs, in which the requirement of coherence can be satisfied all locally or more globally (Smith, M. , 2004). As perceived, one that describes the coherence of instrumental rationa lity is the legal parlance of IRTPA 0f 2004 in the conduct of US war on terrorism wherein recognition, acceptance and collaboration is being worked with allied governments. Thus, the legal parlance in the conduct rationalizes the issues on the flawed personal effects to human rights violations. Based on the journal Substantive and Procedural tenability in Decisions under hesitancy, the procedural rationality is a manner to test the empirical study that is uncertain (Choi, S. , Fisman, R. , Gale, D. , & Kariv, S. , 2005).This definition may be again correlated with the IRTPAs policy that mandates to reform the US intelligence community by creating and establishing the Office of the Director for National Intelligence (ODNI) that shall streamline the operation of US homeland defense system, wherein the level and condition of national and global uncertainties are critically studied and processed in service of policy legislation or Executive decisions (referring to presidential direct ives). To cite, the rational decision-making model refers to the process-analysis of circumstantial or situational factor that is guided by parameters, such as (1) define the situation and decision to be made (2) identify the great criteria for the process and the result (3) consider all possible solutions (4) calculate the consequences of these solutions versus the likeliness of satisfying the criteria and select the best option (Decision-Making-Confidence. Com, 2008). This modeling may be exemplified in the Presidential directives creating the US 9/11 Commission that has recommended the legislative process of enacting the IRTPA of 2004.We may quote the saying of the 2nd US President John Adams (1797-1801) that describes the presidential character, liberty cannot be preserved without general knowledge among the people who have the right to that knowledge and the desire to know, but alike this, they have a right, an indisputable, unalienable, indefeasible, divine right to that m ost dreaded and envied tolerant of knowledgeI mean of the character and conduct of their rulers (President John Adams, 1735-1826 in Texas University Press, 2004). Interpreting the Presidential Character connotes the moral values and virtuosity in the character of a President or a political candidate.It may be perceived that the moral attributions to presidential character also relate to the socio-religious-cultural procreation of the state, to which the moral values of social responsibility, accountability and confidence must be retained to the people. Conclusion The role-modeling of every government in its domestic and foreign affairs is characterized by the figure-heading of a President being the pre-dominant figure of the bureaucracy. It may be said that the 2ist century character of the US government in bringing about and reaching out its foreign policies has related or shifted in the sensibility of personality and political will or decisiveness of the Chief Executive of the L and, especially when formulating effective and strong governance correlating the heroic ideals and championing of democracies.The power shifting, as therewith previously discussed in this paper, could be hearty in framing a foreign policy within the emerging democracies throughout the world. The substantive role of the US government may be viewed as more than strategically entangled in the socio-political-economic conditions of its allied governments and different countries, which may be going beyond based on the Presidential performance and effectiveness of a foreign policy. In todays political race in America, the American people are to a fault conscious in exalting their right to suffrage, likewise the people of the world casts on their predicaments and seeming alienation to whom America shall bear its foreign policy where heroes shall be made.References Choi, S. , Fisman, R. , Gale, D. , and Kariv, S. , (2005). Substantive and Procedural Rationality in Decisions under Uncerta inty. Departmnet of Economics, New York University. Retrieved 01 whitethorn 2008 from http//fic. wharton. upenn. edu/fic/papers/06/0601. pdf. Decision-Making-Confidence. Com (2008). The Rational Decision Making Models. Retrieved 01 whitethorn 2008 from http//www. decision-making-confidence. com/rational-decision-making-models. html. Feldman, O. and Valenty, L. O. (2001). Profiling Political Leaders Cross-Cultural Studies of Personality and Behavior. Questia E-Library. Retrieved 01 whitethorn 2008 fromhttp//www. questia. com/read/113103019? title=Profiling%20Political%20Leaders%3a%20%20Cross-Cultural%20Studies%20of%20Personality%20and%20Behavior. Kellerman, B. (1983). Allison Redux Three much Decision-Making Models. Polity, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 351-367. Palgrave Macmillan Journals. Retrieved 01 May 2008 from http//www. palgrave-journals. com/pal/index. html. Michael, A. (2006). Manage to Change. Retrieved 01 May 2008 from http//managetochange. typepad. com/main/2006/06/the_change_res i_5. html. Olson, L. (2007). Yes, George Bush does recall a British wartime Prime Minister. The Guardian. Retrieved 01 May 2008 from