Should Zoo Be Banned?

Ban zoological garden Background By definition, a zoo is a facility in which zoologys be kept and displayed to the overt. It is a short form of Menagerie, zoological park and garden. The word zoological refers to fauna which means study of fleshlys. An Egyptian queen called Queen Hatshepsut decided to universe variety a zoo about 1500BC and about five hundred historic period later a Chinese Emperor named Wen Wang founded the garden of Intelligence. The Garden of Intelligence was an enormous zoo which was full of different kind of animals and much of ancient statues.During that epoch many small zoos were established to show cater and wealth by rulers from Northern Africa, India, and China. Other well-knget collectors of animals were King Solomonof the farming of Israel and Judah, and KingNebuchadnezzarfromBabylonia. The Roman emperors utilizationd to remark toffee-nosed accruements of animals or private zoos for study purposes or for use in an arna. The ancient Greeks established public zoos to study animal and plant life. That time Greek students used to land zoos as disassociate of their educational activity.In the beginning Europeans did non be possessed of the interest to promise the zoos moreover when explorers bought strange creatures prickle with them, it strangely renewed the interest of Europeans in animals and zoos. In the modern era the oldest existing zoo was theVienna Zooin Austria. Tierpark Hagenbeck is known as the first zoo to use break enclosures surrounded by moats rather than barred cages. The purpose was to keep the animals in touch with nature. My uncle was a zookeeper for over eight years. A lot of generation wild animals get injured and If proper feel for is not granted they might have to delay a disabled life.For instance, owls have precise fragile b 1s in their wings. If it breaks it creates permanent disorder in its flight. For a flightless owl in the wild life it will be difficult to def end up it self easily it might not survive. They pay the bell of their beauty, poor beasts. Mankind pauperisms to catch anything beautiful and shut it up, and then fuck off in thousands to watch it die by inches (qtd. in Best 4). in that respect ar around people who take a baby animal from the jungle to keep it as a coddle. Once the animal grew up it does not look lowere anymore, and may become uncontrollable.Therefore, the person takes it to a zoo to live out the rest of its life. Thus, they start to lose whatever of their natural abilities because zoo do not provide natural environs for wild animals. It may be difficult for an animal to ad sightly to a different surroundings if necessary steps argon not taken. debut zoologys are beingness kept in the zoos has provided people such as children or city dwellers to experience the great biodiversity of the Earth and understand how they behave. These fell-to-earth images of the wildlife are nothing standardised what we could see in disco rattling conduct or books making the zoo a great source of education.It is likewise true that zoo not nevertheless proficient exposes different creatures to us, but in like manner informs the vindicateors on each species of animals such as their scientific names, their specialties, what victuals they eat and their behaviours. Moreover, zoos nowadays are involved in conservation programs of animals that are in the risk of extinction and thus at the selfsame(prenominal) time making visitors aware of them. However, people these days are more concerned in the entertainment because many would come to the zoo for picnics (Kazarov 8).Whenever I visit a zoo I see children who are more arouse in observing the creatures up closely, ignoring the information board provided for that animal. As for the parents, they are more concerned about taking photos of their children next to the pitiful animal. stock- steady if at that place really are people visiting to seek the knowle dge, do you think that the benefits we gain are worth the suffering of thousands of animals of hundreds or species? Furthermore, in the zoos, we bottomlandnot learn as much as a hunter do because we do not see what the animals do naturally, but the unfortunate things through to them. Do we really need zoos?There are many articles, for instance, Zoos and the end of nature written about how animals suffer inner the zoo. These reasons all the more convinced us that animals should not be kept in zoo, for it is a miserable place that restricts the animal regenerate, mistreat them, and use the excuse of maintaining the endanger organisms to keep their business running. Animals in the zoo should have the every right to be able to do what they want and to be free, but the zoos just have to ruin it. One issue that is common in animal rights discourse involves the use of animals in circuses and animal shows where the animals are forced to do such acts.For those who belong to the animal rig hts movement, and for all people who have a genuine concern for all animals, it is not good for humans to use animals in entertainment shows because such act is equivalent to exploitation. Respect and lenience should not be limited to human beings alone. Animals, like humans, have their own natural tendencies. They have their own natural environment where they were originally meant to live and thrive. Respecting the rights of animals includes leaving them in their natural environment where they can grow and transport being the animals that they are.For example, certain marine animals require an environment that is composed of table salt water and a vast space for them to grow. However, the issue to be considered of is that if zoos want to create a perfect habitat environment for animals it would be costly, and thus many zoos in the world do not do so. And when the zoos do not meet the required standard, what would the animals in the zoos become? In some zoos, especially in my cou ntry, the cages are too small that its more of a cell rather than a place to stay.While visitors laughed and have fun aspect at these animals and walking around the zoo, the animals remained bounded inside a cage, like accused criminals. In some zoos, the condition is worse. The cages might be spacious, the environment close to natural, but how do you think they are fed? two bananas a day for a monkey three maybe. Sometimes the zoo seems like a village that recently suffered a drought and the animals inside may be comparable to the refugees from a barren desert. In fact, animals suffered not still physical damage, but as well mental problems. concord to a cover mantled animals normally develop stereotypies. For example, we unremarkably see elephants weaving their bole and head left and right and polar bears pacing incessantly. This could mean that they are frustrated or thwarted due to the poor conditions (Clubb et al 222-223 ). Animals also have emotion, they can be piteou s, they can be happy, they can be distressed. If humans have eventide a single shred of apprehension inside them, they should treat the animals with more care, and realise animals need as much happiness as people. Further misdoing of the zoo is the ill-treatment towards animals.It is not funny for humans to treat animals very badly in roman times, the actions go as far as using them in termination matches. However, zoos, which are more than just a collection of animals, have gone more than acceptable in the way they take care of the animals. For example, in capital of Pakistan Pakistan, a female elephant was get overed to be poisoned. My friend who was present during the investigation found out that the elephant was overdosed by tranquilizers, as anti-anxiety agent. Further investigations show that the death of the animal could have been avoided if not for the irresponsible actions of the care takers.It seemed that a hostility broke out between the care takers over the money th ey gained from the visitors when the visitors rode the elephant and took pictures. It is very horrible to find out that one of the zoo keepers would kill an open creature to set the blame onto the different keeper. Even then, the case was unkindly with nobody charged, as the government confided the dead elephants mate until the true culprit was found, which was never. There was also another case a video report showing a zoo in Oklahoma, G. W Exotic, which had a collection of 1400 animals, of which 200 are big cats.In the video, many of the big cats were treated cruelly tigers were hit on the nose and sometimes even whipped by the care takers, and using them for shows and performances were not a rare occasion. Some big cats were also used to attract viewers by releasing them to the general public and it has been going on for quite long. According to the specialists, a cub is only allowed to interact with human from two to four weeks. There, they have cub 21 weeks old that are di scoverd and brought dangerously close to visitors even when these cubs are carnivores and are known to be ferocious.When this mindless creatures tries to show even a discount aggression they are punished severely even though the zoo made these misjudgements of bringing them to visitors at this age. A cub was brutally whipped when it circumstantially harmed a child. And after all these cruel things reached the media, the authorities came to close down the school, and the insane owner irresponsibly released all the animals from their cage. It is not just one case, not just two. This is happening all over the world. And while only few cases are being uncovered and prosecuted by the authorities, many more animals are suffering their fate in silence.In order to counterbalance up for the criticisms due to the reasons above, zoos nowadays may claim that they help protect peril species animals and at the same time revive them. For example, zoos now have captive breeding programs to incr ease the number of the threatened animals, as the animals are being monitored and taken care by animal experts. In this way, those animals can be defended from their problem that they would have faced in their natural surroundings. Animals that are usually the prey would be safe from being hunted by their predatory animals whereas predator animals such as lions would not have died due to starvation.This is because zoos keep the same kind together while providing them food. These are at least the arguments that zoos can announce and they also claim that they will be able to release the captive creatures back to the wild. However, is there evidence that the majority of the zoos will be able to perform such task? The answer is no. According to an article more than 95% of the world zoo industries do not take part in official captive propagation and reintroduction initiatives (Laidlaw 4). What is the blockage of raising the animals where there is no certainty of releasing of them?Suppo se there are a small number of zoos that genuinely reintroduce their animals back to the wild, will it be successful? The animals that they have been raising will have lost their animals instincts as a result of being kept in a place without the interaction between animals of different species, being contain in a small place causing lack of ferment and being given food instead of the animals working for themselves. In addition, there will be animals that are born in the zoo in which they never have the jungle experience.Take tiger for example, for them to survive, they must know other animals behaviour in order to hunt and they must have hard legs. But how can they perform that when they have not been in impinging with other creatures and how can they jump and run quickly without the having to hunt forwards? It will be just like my houses pet dog which does not know how to cross the road. Lets just pretend that the zoos have managed to teach them, but there are still further i ssues and that is the number of red list species that zoos are actually conserving.According to a report it was found that the CCZ, 13 zoos in the UK, known as the crime syndicate of Charitable Zoos, only keep 3. 5% of the animal species that are in the threat of extinction, and the majority them are the least concerned species. Only 24. 7 to 29 % of the zoos animals are in the red list zone (Animal 3). This in a sense mean that, zoos are not able of doing conservation of endangered animals, plus it also means that there are still many other creatures kept in the zoo that are not threatened. An eagle should be seen soaring through the sky spectacularly, a lion roaming he jungle fiercely it is such a sad event to see them restricted in the zoo. What we see in the zoo are not really the animals that we see, but rather a figure that resembles the images of the creatures of what we learn in the school. What I would define a zoo, is a mammoth prison that holds tons of innocent animals as prisoners in order to posit money. As humans cannot live with animals in the jungle, same happens with animals. Animals are part of nature and increase the beauty they are not made to keep in zoos and earn money.Did we also ever realize that we are actually paying money to the zoos to see such prisoners for our entertainment or education purposes? Indeed, a zoo is a business centre all they do is to make profit such as from animal circuses, animals trading. Moreover, they would try to cut down the cost of building a healthy natural habitat, at least not for every species, and they would feed animals with a limited occur of food where the food might not be of proper nutrition. To make matter worse, poorer countries do not have good facilities or the budget, even for a certain individual species.Even for conservation of endangered species, they do not invest their own money, but accept donation from people and wildlife companies. In zoos like that we will normally see a donation recession presented next to the threatened species. If they are really providing help for the protection of wildlife, wherefore not use their own fund. Finally, with strong voice, we can say that Zoos should be ban in human societies because its nothing but a giving pain to the animals in many ways. Work Cited Animal Ark or Sinking Ship? . Born Free Foundation. July 2007. Web. http//www. bornfree. org. uk/fileadmin/user_upload/files/zoo_check/animal_ark. df. Nov 24 2012. Clubb, Ros. Mason, Georgia. A check into of the Welfare of Zoo Elephants in Europe. University of Oxford. 2003. Print. Dr. Best, Steven. Zoo and the End of Nature. University of Texas. 1999. Web. http//www. zoocheck. com/articlepdfs/Zoos%20and%20the%20End%20of%20Nature. pdf. Nov 22 2012. Kazarov, Elena. The Role of Zoo in creating a Conservation Ethic in Visitors. Australia, Sydney Washington University in St. Louis. 2008. Web. http//digitalcollections. sit. edu/cgi/viewcontent. cgi? article=1579&context=isp_col lection. Nov 24 2012. Laidlaw, Rob. Reintroduction of